dc.description.abstract |
This study was a descriptive analysis of object marking (OM) in Kihehe. The study specifically
focused on morphological morphemes that could occupy the object position, explaining the behaviour
of the post-verbal noun phrases (NPs) in relation to OM and the role of discourse in Kihehe object
marking. Generally, the study aims at analysing the syntax and discourse of object marking in Kihehe.
Specifically, the study focused on the following specific objectives:
• To identify the morphological morphemes that could occupy object position;
• To explain the behaviours of post-verbal NPs in relation to object hood features; and
• To explain the role of discourse in Kihehe object marking.
In order to provide a descriptive analysis of object marking in Kihehe, which was the main aim of
this study, the study employed a qualitative research design. It was qualitative due to the nature of data that needed to be collected. The data that were collected included oral data, which were later
transcribed into words in a written form. Other data were obtained from various Kihehe texts. Data
were collected in the natural setting. The aim was to obtain data that explain how the language is
used in natural setting.
Data was collected from primary sources and secondary sources. Primary sources included interviews
(structured interviews) with focused group discussions and questionnaires with a list of sentences to
be elicited. Secondary data was obtained from Kihehe text and narrative books.
The study could not cover all geographical areas in Iringa Region. It based on research conducted in
Ipilimo Village, which is found in lhowanza Division, Mufindi District. The village 'was preferred
because it had a large number of Kihehe native speakers and it had less influence from other
languages. Kihehe was used as the medium of communication in homes, local churches, and in local
community gatherings.
The informants for this study were obtained using snowball or chain sampling. Snowball sampling
starts with principled list of key respondents who are then tasked to recruit further participants who
are similar to them in some respect central to the investigation. |
en_US |