dc.description.abstract |
Traditional and other rural producer organizations (RPO) in Tanzania have tended to concentrate
in the production and marketing of raw export-oriented agricultural crops (traditionally referred
to as cash crops). Despite the perceived benefits of business diversification for RPOs todate, they
have remained single product, single activity and single function organisations. This situation
has denied the members a wide range of products and services necessary to attain a higher living.
Opportunities for diversification abound among RPOs, Agro-processing of the abundant
agricultural crops is one of the opportunities. Non-traditional agricultural crops such as vanilla
paprika, chilies, flowers etc. are being introduced. Yet very few RPOs are taking up these
opportunities.
This study had four major objectives:
• to and analyse the existing and potential business 'hat could be exploited by
RPOs
• to analyze extent to Which have diversified their businesses and the resulting
benefits to the members
• to analyze factors 'hat are encouraging diversification of businesses among
RPOs
• to identify constraints to increased business diversifictin and suggest future actions to further business diversification and expansion
Study areas were RPOs in Tanga, Iringa, Kilimanjaro and Bukoba. Crops covered are vanilla
cardamon, paprika, grapes and mushrooms including honey. The methodology utilized
included; literature review focusing on the emerging rural business opportunities, field visits
were face to face interviews and discussions and providing feedback to the respective RPOs
and thereafter come up with favourable recommendations.
The findings revealed that emerging business opportunities abound both in the domestic
and export markets but farmers are not aware of them. Apart from production of raw, high value agricultural products, a greater potential for increasing producers' incomes lies with
processing of these raw products.
Farmers have decided to diversify due to the following reasons; first falling world market
prices of major traditional cash and export crops; secondly land shortage for expanded
production of their traditional crops; thirdly to smoothen out income flows throughout the
year; fourthly to better manage risks associated with monoculture; fifthly due to high
transaction costs in marketing and input supply is another factor that has influenced farmers
to diversify and lastly due to expectations for higher incomes, improving their living
conditions and exploiting niche /specialty markets within and outside the country.
Thefindingsfurther revealed that the Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives Societies
(AMCOS) are dealing with traditional crops like coffee without any diversification. Though,
diversification of crops has led to increased production due to the high yields and relatively
low production costs per harvest. It was also observed that services are minimally provided
except where there is donor support and farmers and farmers receive relatively low prices
due to lack of processing facilities.
It was further revealed that farmerslack organized marketing associations. And thus, farmers
are incurring high transaction costs in marketing which include searching for market information, transport and processing
Gender wig-concentration on high value crops has been one of the opportunities whereby
women have participated in rural
The impact of crop diversification includes; increased income, gender empowerment,
improved nutritional status, mitigating environmental degradation and growth of Savings
and Credit Cooperative Societies.
From the findings the following was recommended: first is that traditional AMCOS should
accept crop diversification; secondly, organizational change to be undertaken in traditional
AMCOS, thirdly RPOs should facilitate marketing of members produce; fourthly RPOs to
facilitate and promote processing of agricultural products so as add value; fifthly Government
in collaboration with RPOs to assist in extension services and lastly, they should be a link
between crop diversifying RPOs and SACCOS. |
en_US |