Abstract:
Governance is the mechanisms, processes and institutions through which citizens or
groups articulate their interests and exercise their legal rights. It is a mechanism that
help citizens to meet their obligations, mediate the differences and promote key
services delivery in their jurisdictions particularly LGAs. With undeniable reality on
improved services delivery in LGAs, the integrated village and Mtaa (Mtaa)
committee members’ participation mechanisms accountability and transparency are
outdated. Thus, the study was conducted in Local government authorities of Dodoma
city, Chamwino and Kongwa District Councils to examine the effects of
transparency in LGAs service delivery, determine the effects of accountability on
ensuring LGAs service delivery, examine the impact of village and Mtaa (Mtaa)
committee members’ participation towards influencing LGAs service delivery and
determine institutional arrangement factors influencing service delivery in LGAs.
Cross sectional research design was adopted, whereby sample size was 399 and a
multistage sampling technique was used to get accurate representative sample size.
In wards and villages, a simple random sampling was used to select respondents.
Questionnaire was a main tool and it was supported with key informant interview
guide and desk review for secondary data. Qualitative data were analyzed using
content analysis while stereotype logistics regression (SL), ordered logistic
regression and structural equation modeling were among quantitative analysis
techniques employed. Stereotype logistic regression modal results found that the
contribution of transparency is minimal in LGAs services delivery. Using ordered
regression, the results show that accountability is statistically significant towards
services delivery. Moreover, using SL regression model, results revealed that each
aspect was indicated by the observed negative significance of village council and
Mtaa member’s participation in relation to the LGAs' service delivery, structural
equation model (SEM) found that institutional arrangement had a positive
relationship effect on LGAs services delivery at 84% whereby, by-laws, acts and
policies were 86%, 0.86.4% and 90%, respectively. The major concern for low
transparency in LGAs might be inadequate chain of command in the Tanzania LGAs
framework. I addition, low level of communication technology is used in most local
government authorities in Tanzania and it is associated with limited transparency and
low accountability. Furthermore, absence of stakeholders’ engagement plan
xiii
weakened stakeholders’ participation in LGAs services delivery and good
compliance with institutional arrangements increased the propensity of LGAs to
serve the citizens in an efficient manner. Therefore, regulatory framework should be
adjusted to ensure LGAs officials are more transparent in delivering day to day
services. Further, there is a need of ICT innovation in LGAs setting for effective
transparency and improved services delivery. Additional, engagement plans should
be designed to ensure sustainable service delivery in the LGAs, unlike the traditional
approaches used mainly in villages and Mtaa assembly