Abstract:
Co-operative societies’ dispute settlement is among the contentious areas under the current
Tanzanian legal machinery. The machinery requires ‘co-operative disputes’ to be settled through
negotiation/reconciliation, reference to the Registrar, and finally appeal to the Minister. The
machinery appears to preclude ordinary courts from entertaining co-operative disputes. It defines a
co-operative dispute by ‘listing’ the probable parties to it and their controversies over so called ’co operative business’. What remains unclear is the scope of the business of a co-operative society. The
lack of clarity has resulted into disputes involving co-operative societies in the hands of courts of
law. Expectedly, multiple ‘Preliminary Objections’ are raised on the point of lack of jurisdiction. The
High Court of Tanzania has entertained some of these disputes. The study analyses the unsettled
legal position on the authority of ordinary courts of law in settlement of co-operative disputes in
Tanzania. Inter alia, it highlights the converging and diverging decisions of the High Court on the
area. Of interest is the shared understanding that co-operative disputes are resolved through
internal mechanisms and departure is as to what follows after the exhaustion of the mechanisms.
Noted is the absence of a common understanding on ordinary courts authority over co-operative
disputes, the extent of what they can preliminarily entertain and orders to be given. The study
analyses the decisions, draw important conclusions and proposes ways forward with considerations
seeking to strike a balance between preserving co-operative identity and ensuring equitable justice
through access to the courts of law.
