Abstract:
In Tanzania, furniture industries play a significant role in fostering socio-economic
development and poverty alleviation. Previous research has not fully addressed
factors affecting competitive advantage of small scale furniture manufacturing
industries in Tanzania while there is influx of furniture import. This study analyzed
factors affecting competitive advantage of SIDO supported small scale furniture
industries in Dar es Salaam and Arusha regions. Specifically, the study characterized
SIDO supported small scale furniture industries, compared the profitability, analyzed
the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay as well as factors affecting
competitiveness of SIDO supported small scale furniture manufactures using a
sample of 337 respondents who were purposively sampled, whereby 127 were drawn
from SIDO supported manufacturers, 76 from furniture importers and 134 furniture
consumers in Dar es Salaam and Arusha cities. Quantitative and qualitative
techniques were used to analyze data. The study found that furniture industry was
mainly dominated by males. Level of education and initial capital were found to be
low for small scale furniture industries owners compared to imported ones. Small
scale furniture industries were found to generate low profit compared to imported
furniture. Consumers’ preferences on locally made and imported furniture were 82% and 83% respectively influenced by education, price, design, quality, age, income
and household size. On the aspect of willingness to pay for furniture, the study
revealed that consumers were willing to pay more for imported furniture than for
locally made furniture. The factors that significantly affected willingness to pay for
furniture products were age, household size, quality, income, design, brand and
knowledge. The results of the regression analysis tested at p<0.05 showed that age of
iii
the firm (β = 0.471, p = 0.034), initial capital (β = 0.260, p=0.000), number of
employees (β = 0.099, p=0.000), price (β = -0.244, p = 0.000), location (β = -0.189, p = 0.000), diversification (β = -0.112, p = 0.015) and networking (β = 0.053, p =
0.008) significantly affected competitiveness of the SIDO supported small scale
furniture industries. The recommendations emanating from the study are to allocate
sufficient start-up capital, hire adequate number of employees and ensure effective
utilization of employees for successful operational performance of the enterprises as
well as ensure effective utilization of networking potentials for resource sharing and
market access. It is expected that these findings will provide insight to the small
scale furniture manufacturers on approaches to use when producing furniture items
basing on market needs.