MoCU Repository

Mapping the Research Productivity and Scholarly Impact of the Traditional Medicine Scholars in Tanzania: A Scientometric Analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lwoga, Edda T.
dc.contributor.author Sife, Alfred S.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-08-22T10:21:05Z
dc.date.available 2023-08-22T10:21:05Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Lwoga, E. T. & Sife A. S. (2013). Mapping the Research Productivity and Scholarly Impact of the Traditional Medicine Scholars in Tanzania: A Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Digital Library Services, Vol 3:3 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2250- 1142
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.mocu.ac.tz/xmlui/handle/123456789/558
dc.description A full text article from Library, Information Sciences and Knowledge Economy en_US
dc.description.abstract A scientometric analysis was conducted to map out the research productivity and scholarly impact of researchers at the Institute of Traditional Medicine (ITM) in Tanzania for the period between 1980 and 2013. The study analyzed the growth of the ITM’s scholarly literature; ascertained the year-wise distribution of publications; determined the authorship pattern and degree of collaboration; and analyzed individual scholars’ productivity and impact. Data were obtained using the Publish or Perish software that employs Google Scholar to retrieve scholars’ publications and their citations. The findings show that there were a total of 381 publications published between 1980 and 2013, giving an average of 11.2 publications per year. The year 2012 had the most (12.3%) number of publications followed by 2007 and 2008 with 8.9% of all publications each. A vast majority (91.9%) of the publications were multiple-authored with 35.2% of the publications having six or more authors. The degree of collaboration was 0.92 and the ratio between team work and single author work was 11:1. Overall, M.J. Moshi and Z.H. Mbwambo were the top ranking scholars followed by R.L.A. Mahunnah and F.C. Uiso. All ITM researchers showed variation in their performance as no single scholar maintained the same rank in all nine metrics. The study findings call for scholars to recognize the importance of publishing in visible journals in order to receive large citation counts. Institutions are urged to employ scientometrics in evaluating the research performance of their scholars since such techniques take into account a combination of several measures. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Journal of Digital Library Services en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Vol. 3;3
dc.subject Research en_US
dc.subject Research productivity en_US
dc.subject Scholarly impact en_US
dc.subject Traditional medicine en_US
dc.subject Scientometrics en_US
dc.subject Tanzania en_US
dc.title Mapping the Research Productivity and Scholarly Impact of the Traditional Medicine Scholars in Tanzania: A Scientometric Analysis en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search MoCU IR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account